Free Agent Nation

I am only about a third of the way through this book (author: Daniel Pink), but am so excited about it that I feel compelled to share. It describes the change in the American worker from "The Organization Man" to the "Free Agent". Being a free agent myself, and also being very interested in careers, personal and professional development, it's no surprise how much I like this book. However, one point made in a chapter I read today compelled me to write about the book before I finished it.

The question: Is a job in a major corporation really more stable than being "diversified" with multiple clients and various projects?

First, a little background...

When I decided to go out on my own and consult I put on a brave face but was almost as nervous as my parents ("How will you get health insurance?", "But you aren't going to have a job???", etc.). My parents are big on stability, and you know what, it turns out so am I. The difference is that I feel more stable (and much, much happier) with a portfolio of clients and a range of expertise to offer than I ever did when I had that "real" job. So my answer to the question "is a job in a major corporation really more stable than being 'diversified' with multiple clients and various projects?" I think not, especially for me, especially in today's economy.

As one of my major consulting contracts nears its end, I've been contemplating getting one of those "real jobs" everyone speaks about. It's always an option, but I think for now I'll renew my membership in Free Agent Nation.

More to come as I make my way through this fantastic book! I highly recommend it for anyone who works for themselves or has ever thought about it...